Revised Chapter One
Chapter One:
Car In A Closed Garage
“Take me out to the ball game.”
* * * * *
A human life is like a baseball team born in the spring, reaching maturity in summer, peaking in the early fall, dying before winter. That dead team will never exist again, for even if the identical players, coaches, and manager return (which rarely happens), their individual and collective states-of-mind will not be the same. Physical aging and the experiences of the previous year will change them, just as ours changes us. They are better or worse, more confident or less, advancing in ability, or regressing. Something constant remains, however, and prepares a new team for a new birth and a new life.
* * * * *
Many years ago, a Vietnam war widow with two young sons moved into a country cottage, near where I had retreated to write my first book (subsequently awarded the dubious honor of Ultimate Self-Censure by Fire).
My pre-widow days were paradise: writing, reading, musing. In the early evenings, I treated myself to well-paced, long walks on and along a soft dirt path traversing a meadow miles in length, several times bridging a lazy meandering creek possessing an ambitious aspiration—judging from the unused depth and width of its bed—to become a raging river.
Came the summer solstice sunset, every year a time to contemplate my emotional connection to the relentless soil toil of past generations, who savored the longest day because it heralded a rare rest recess between the end of the planting season and the beginning of the harvest. Additionally, the Northern hemisphere is never closer to the sun, and for many—including me—such an equinoctial event has been and remains sufficient motivation to celebrate Stonehenge-mode adorations.
Perhaps pagan gods were smiling broadly during this particular solstice. Or does solar proximity explain the onslaught of heat when for the initial time the scouts that are my eyes sighted her approach. I doubt the latter.
Her boys had run ahead and were timidly peeking over the protective rock arms of a minimus arched bridge, cobbled together by a local artisan’s adroit integration of creek bottom stones.
The young woman wore a flower-pattern hippie granny dress, for which I am a well-known sucker. I smiled. She smiled. The boys glanced at her face. They stared at mine. Two months later we were living together. That’s another story.
Here’s the one that stays in my mind.
Under the principle that opposite is better, my lessons of how to be a good father were learned from a bad father. The latter is not presently our concern.
Suffice to report I spent many hours being a guide and a faithful guardian to these wonderful children, whose fundamental goodness was a tribute to the love-filled nurturing of their mother.
We all became friends. The boys loved it when, one at a time, I held their wrists and swung them in a circle as fast as I could.
“More,” each one would shout when their turn ended. “Do it again.” They enjoyed the dizziness. I enjoyed regaining my sense of balance.
When we had been together for a while, they cautiously and haltingly told me the story of their dad, including that he had been wounded by gunfire in a war, and fallen off his boat, and drowned in a far away river. I learned they had no affection for flowing water, and would often play at creek’s edge, but never enter.
Living with the widow, for all its precious compensations, was paradise lost. Once they began to love me, her children, aged seven and six, demanded constant attention. So too the widow. Gone were the days when I had liberty to write, and read, and think. For all practical purposes, the second and third items on my Edenistic list had become impossible, and without them, how the first?
My frustration with this unwelcome aspect of my new reality eventually caused a pleasant and promising relationship to founder. But not before an incident which I earnestly pray was beneficial to all three of my live-in companions, two directly and one by osmosis.
* * * * *
Matt Ridley: “Mother and fetus have a common purpose, but argue fiercely about the details of how much of the mother’s resources the fetus may have.
“The father’s genes do not trust the mother’s genes to make a sufficiently invasive placenta; so they do the job themselves.”
* * * * *
Baseball’s lack of territoriality gladdens my heart.
One team takes the field. After three are out, that nine leaves and is replaced by its opposition. No territory is claimed or ceded. The seventeen or eighteen exchanges are non-violent.
During the course of a game, both teams usually have opportunities to touch “home.” Though the winner’s gonfalon is awarded to the aggregation successfully doing so more times than its competition, by the rules no one can claim to “own” home.
When I was young, I read an encyclopedic article about the wisdom of Black Elk. The philosophic Chief describes a mindset typically Indian—a stewardship-rather-than-ownership relationship with the land on which they lived and hunted.
Baseball is more in harmony with a nomadic mindset rather than that of a landowner. No wonder it became our national pastime during a time of massive immigration.
Baseball’s intrinsic non-violence profoundly influenced my formative years. As a lad, I could see that the other boys were using violence (fisticuffs and wrestling) to establish a pecking order. Studying my favorite game helped me come to a maverick conclusion—difficult to achieve and thus more dearly held—that fights were unnecessary.
Over time, playing sports taught me that I had many competitive advantages and would come out on top in most brawls. Yet to what purpose?
To me, the whole dance seemed like a foolhardy and ridiculous exercise. Even under severe provocation, I abstained from street combat and suffered the inevitable resultant humiliations.
So what? Their accusations re: my cowardice were not credible. I knew it took more courage to do what I was doing—being true to my beliefs—than it did to unthinkingly adhere to the animal territorial choreography captivating the majority.
Ironically enough, on the gridiron—rather than the diamond—I had the capacity to make them pay, including the ones who secretly felt I was right.
* * * * *
Three days of rain hammered our cottage home. Our initial sanguinity derived from the “we’re safe inside” pleasure of listening to water drum roof. This faded soon, then disappeared.
Cabin fever being contagious, we all had it. So on the third day, the woman and I swathed the boys in anti-rain gear, and I took them for a walk. She chose a different direction. I think she was tired of being with me. The boys honored her wish.
The path was mud, so the three of us trampled the adjoining saw grass, bent as it was from the added of weight of three-day aqua saturation. As we stepped on the first bridge, the boys’ eyes went wide. The creek had achieved its goal. Fast moving water now filled its pleased bed.
Surrendering their momentum, they froze in space, as quickly as if they both had stepped on snakes. In an instant, I processed their fear and realized that, if not faced, it surely would constellate into something deeply harmful.
What better time than now? Isn’t that always the question?
I bent my knees to be eye to eye with my young friends.
“Do you trust me?”
Hesitation.
“Do you trust me? Yes or no. Either answer is okay.”
“Yes.” From both.
“Take my hands.” They did.
“Look at that water. Do you know who is in charge of it today?”
“Who?”
“Dr. Death. He took your Dad. Now he wants you…and me. Do you want to leave your bodies with him?”
“Please no.” “I don’t.”
“Me neither. But we can’t be intimidated. We can’t let him run our life. Can we?”
‘How can we stop him?” This from the seven-year-old. Nothing from the six, but a determined expression told his tale.
“Do you trust me?”
Hesitation. “Yes.” From both.
“Let’s challenge Dr. Death on his own turf.”
Brave boys. Afraid. Stared at me. I nodded yes.
They did not speak. We waited. We waited.
Finally, the oldest took a deep breath. His eyes narrowed as he nodded to his brother. A few more seconds passed.
As if by pre-arranged signal, a little hand from each boy reached for one of mine. Still wordless, we waded together into the rapidly flowing water. Knee high to them. Waist. Chest. I kept a careful watch, especially on the younger and shorter, now heart deep. I was glad his mother could not see him.
I swear that I could hear the thump of their hearts. Whatever they were thinking and feeling, they kept moving with me.
I began to trash-talk. “Come on, Death. Take your best shot. Is this all you are? A rippling puddle? You call this danger? You have nothing! Your mother dates life support technicians!”
We were halfway across and in the deepest water. Suddenly the boys began to shout their own defiance. “Hey, Death. You suck. That’s right. You heard us. Your mother dates you.”
The river whipped around their bodies, wrapped them, pushed them, fought to knock them down and take them. Suddenly, as if acting with one mind, they dropped my hands, and turned to face the oncoming current on their own, fully extending their arms toward the sky. The older one shouted:
“You killed our dad, but you can’t hurt us. Not today. Not yet. We’re not afraid of you. We’re not gonna die in this water. We’re gonna live. Live. Do you hear? Live. Live.”
His brother joined him, “Live. We’re gonna live. You don’t scare us. Not today. Not now. Live. Live.”
They cried. I made a funny face. They laughed. We started again and made it safely across the distended creek. Safe on the bank, they hugged my legs and, with great excitement, looked up into my downward gaze.
“We beat Dr. Death,” they exclaimed in unison. Added the six-year-old, “The water’s ours.”
* * * * *
The pause between the pitches. William Wordsworth: “Reflection comes with the lull, taking its origin from emotion recollected in tranquility.”
* * * * *
How To Watch Sports:
Option One, The Partisan: If you are not willing to accept the possibility of pain, you forfeit the possibility of pleasure. How can you be elated in victory unless you are willing to be crushed by defeat?
Option Two, The Detached: Move beyond the duality of victory and defeat. Bob Costas finds pleasure from whatever emerges through the flow and pattern of the game. He has moved his emotional attachment beyond the partisan.
This is only reason he has never been the play-by-play announcer for the Yankees or Cardinals or any one team. His skills are more than sufficient, but his partisanship has long since sailed. Consequently, he is a network man.
Does sport still generate sufficient emotion for him and his ilk? Of a different sort, I think. Competition by exceptionally talented individuals and teams has the virtue of frequently producing singular excellence. Appreciation of these occurrences—absent partisan distortion—is superior.
Cause and effect are more easily perceived and evaluated. Patterns emerge. Lessons are learned. Detachment is the path of maturity, progress, expertise, understanding, wisdom. Such things are lasting wealth, but are they enough to satisfy human longing?
* * * * *
Doctors have morphed into medicinal bean counters, mechanics with a check list, substituting the detachment of technology for the healing wisdom of the family doctor, the shaman, the medicine man.
What connects them to the passions of life? What is wise about their detachment? They are in dire need of a pennant race.
Here is how I propose to cure doctors:
They each shall be required to pick a team, pay careful attention to every game, avidly read what is written, post on a fan board, endure the directness of rational and irrational responses, get to know the philosophy and personality of the coach and players, suffer when they lose, rejoice when they win, hope for the championship, and when it doesn’t come, wait till next year, and when it does, make like the ’85 Cardinals and celebrate, celebrate, celebrate.
* * * * *
Why are we attached to an outcome which almost always give us no direct material benefit?
Consider the secret spiritual treasure given by sports to watcher: the gift of identifying with something not solely self. This glorious transcendence unseats the narrowest definition of self-interest and moves athlete and observer beyond money, class, religion, race, geography, ethnicity. That in the physical universe which has the illusion of division is experienced as unity.
* * * * *
The movie “Being There” is based on the philosophical insights of Heidegger and Voltaire. The key elements are state-of-mind and gardening.
Simply put, I feel you should know this.
* * * * *
I had to go to the hospital again today. So much pain. Damn! I have a picture in my head of my car in a closed garage, motor running. No.
Maybe.
* * * * *
What is time? Einstein discovered its variability within physical reality. Simply put, energy has a sum, and this totality is divided between forward motion in time and forward motion in space. Thus someone riding in a car traveling 70 miles an hour is growing older slightly more slowly than someone sitting at a desk. That’s a fact, though not nearly an entire explanation.
But time’s relativity is not limited to physical reality. Time is also relative within mental reality.
I know this is true, because I have experienced it, as have thousands of others. With experience and concentration, athletes undergo their own version of relativity. The “game” slows down.
What seems like three seconds to spectators can seem like three minutes to those so engaged. It is accurate to report that a focused competitor can enter a zone in which she or he flows faster than earth’s “base time,” while interacting with others still apparently moving at what we call a “normal rate.”
To an athlete, it is the “not-me” whose speed has decreased, because personal pace—to personal perception—remains constant. This, of course, is the foundation of Einstein’s discovery.
I hungrily embrace my too few moments in this zone. Time’s passage is elongated here as necessary, in some cases to total stoppage, arguably the true maximum. Or just as there is an unseen physical world existing below the molar level, perhaps there is also micro-time, possibly a place in which one can do marvelous things, such as travel from century to century, as unlikely as that seems to those conditioned by normal life. I don’t know because I’ve not experienced micro—yet.
Regardless, I remember striving to catch a football and seeing it absolutely motionless in the air, patiently waiting, or so I conceived, for me to raise my arms and bring to cradle.
All other stimuli were muted and dimmed, as if heard and seen through “a glass darkly.” But the ball, the beautiful ball, remained perfectly illuminated. Behind the coveted sphere, a disintegrating sky. Below, a disappearing world.
My grasp did not exceed my reach. The catch was mine! And with a sonic roar, normality rushed to flood my senses.
So yes, I have no doubt that the mind has the power to alter time. Perhaps one day we shall formulate this into an immutable law.
* * * * *
My dear friend Bob Broeg, who gave Stan Musial his immortal nickname “Stan the Man,” has passed. He had the knack of having everything he wanted come to him, although he never acted selfishly. Maybe the latter explains the former.
I had the honor to write the second and final draft of his autobiography. As I result I learned to understand him and, at the same time, grew to love him.
Once Bob and I, returning from a meeting with his publishers, found ourselves in Springfield, Illinois, a little after dinner time. Famished, Bob urged me to stop so he could have a “horseshoe” sandwich and savor a couple of Buds.
We took our seats at the bar to ensure fast service. Soon we were swapping stories about sports and women. Bob’s hearty laugh boomed throughout the restaurant.
Within minutes we were surrounded by people who recognized Bob’s guffaws and flocked to his side. “You’re Bob Broeg,” one said. “Yes,” he answered. “What can I do for you?”
What he could do is what he naturally did. For more than two hours, Bob told them his stories and they told him theirs. During this time, no evil had the power to enter our restaurant. Goodness reigned unchallenged.
When we left, goodbyes were said, sometimes more than once, for we lingered, loath to part, not wanting the too-short evening to come an end, looking for the right words to demonstrate our appreciation for what we had shared.
Many of the restaurant’s patrons walked with him to our car and watched as we drove away, waving yet another farewell.
As them then, so me now.
Goodbye, Bob. I’m waving. See you on the other side.
* * * * *
I used to be almost entirely unloving. Selfish, really, without conscious intent to be so. I didn’t realize that I possessed this trait until my forties. Yet from my teens, my main prayer has always been: “Help me grow more loving.”
How interesting that I should ask for what I needed, long before I understood the need.
Oh, and this: such a prayer, while a blessing, is so central to the essence of human growth that its answer has to be hard-earned step-by-step.
* * * * *
Can I go back in time to the first moon landing? That’s when my wife informed me that during our separation she had taken a lover. Tough lunar association. My reaction left much to be desired.
So I’d like to return to that evening and talk with her from my current perspective. Not because of any desire to save our marriage. We had no business being an officially sanctioned couple. Our happiest wedded morning was the day the divorce became official.
I’d like a chance to respond to her admission of infidelity (perhaps that’s the wrong word…we were on a break) with love, not hurt. And, if I muster the courage, admit to my own adultery, which preceded hers.
Actually, all I want is a chance to tell her the truth as I see it now, not as I saw it then. Life is much more gentle than I believed it to be while in my twenties.
One small step.
* * * * *
Every mental aggregate has a sense of “I am.” Sometimes this core is called a “monad,” sometimes its appellation is “the heart of hearts.”
This central sense of identity is relatively unaffected by circumstance. Age and disease affect it indirectly.
* * * * *
And thirties. And forties.
* * * * *
Everything in every sentence of this book—including this one—is fiction.
* * * * *
The basic law of the mental universe is aggregation, as true a description of reality as Einstein’s relativity or Newton’s gravity.
* * * * *
Like every town, my home village had a bully. One day he came around to the field where I was playing baseball with some of my friends, took notice/umbrage of/at my enthusiasm, and backed me against the faded red bricks of the east wall of the school gym. He insisted I fight him. I offered to wrestle.
He said it had to be fists. I said no. Why? Because I don’t believe in violence, I told him. True enough, my claim. Yet not totally accurate. Something else was stopping me. Something lurking in shadow, sensed but unseen. No time to speculate. The bully hit me in the face and told me I would get worse if he ever saw me on the schoolyard diamond again.
Maybe I was brave, maybe stubborn. I neither left nor stayed away one minute that I wanted to be on that field. He returned twice more and slugged me to the ground each time. As I neither resisted nor relented, he grew bored and started passing without taking action. Finally, he stopped his threats.
I felt as if I had validated Mahatma Gandhi.
Yet what lived in my darkness?
* * * * *
If I were Divine, and I believe I am, dogma would be understood as a barrier to self-realization. If you were Divine, and I believe you are, disdain of dogma would be universally elemental. Which means it is.
* * * * *
Before illness took his ability to command his muscles, Stephen Hawking had a reputation that went beyond (though perhaps hand in hand) with being the world’s brightest and best physicist. Arrogant. Dominating. Determined to shape events and beliefs his way. Believing he was the chosen one best suited to find the right path.
Does that same personality still exist somewhere in the mass of twisted limbs and distorted features? How has it been reshaped by his illness?
Is his heart of hearts—the core of his being—impervious to the deficiencies of physical form? Is he in his depths still a dominant personality, the alpha mind of science, though currently unable to impose his will by force of personality? Because he worshipped thought, did karma grant him a world limited to idea?
Does he still dream as a human…or something beyond?
What is it like to be his friend?
* * * * *
Today I went to a special sub-specialist clinic…a Center for Advanced Medicine…where I was examined by eight doctors, who took sixteen vials of my blood and subjected me to yet another conductivity test, wherein electricity is fed into my system to measure the ability of my nerves to transmit messages to and from my brain.
Every time I am forced into this procedure, I fantasize that after it is completed, I should be allowed to administer it to the prescribing doctor.
Results of the tests will be available in three weeks.
Slow time!